<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leaked photo&#8217;s of next iPhone case?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalintrovert.com/2009/02/13/leaked-photos-of-next-iphone-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalintrovert.com/2009/02/13/leaked-photos-of-next-iphone-case/</link>
	<description>apple &#124; tech talk &#124; how-to &#124; gaming &#124; digital art &#124; music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:45:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomacintosh</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalintrovert.com/2009/02/13/leaked-photos-of-next-iphone-case/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>tomacintosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomacintosh.com/?p=575#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I honestly don&#039;t feel the rubberization guys, I&#039;d say it was more like the new iPod Classics, go check them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly don&#8217;t feel the rubberization guys, I&#8217;d say it was more like the new iPod Classics, go check them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalintrovert.com/2009/02/13/leaked-photos-of-next-iphone-case/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomacintosh.com/?p=575#comment-34</guid>
		<description>When I saw the screenshots my first thought, like Chris&#039;, was that it appeared rubberized and the logo is very gold-leaf-like. Not sure how I&#039;d feel about that rubbery surface. I actually wouldn&#039;t mind if they went back to the metal of the 1st gen iPhone. I always thought that looked good although never got to feel one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw the screenshots my first thought, like Chris&#8217;, was that it appeared rubberized and the logo is very gold-leaf-like. Not sure how I&#8217;d feel about that rubbery surface. I actually wouldn&#8217;t mind if they went back to the metal of the 1st gen iPhone. I always thought that looked good although never got to feel one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomacintosh</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalintrovert.com/2009/02/13/leaked-photos-of-next-iphone-case/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>tomacintosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomacintosh.com/?p=575#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Could very well be, I doubt Apple will use the rubberized stuff, it&#039;s just not hard wearing enough. I&#039;m trying to work out if that camera hole is a bit bigger than the current one. I&#039;m hoping for 5mp in the new phone, although I would probably be happy with a 3.2mp with Auto-focus. Sony Ericsson have used them in their phones for years so I can&#039;t see the lens costing that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could very well be, I doubt Apple will use the rubberized stuff, it&#8217;s just not hard wearing enough. I&#8217;m trying to work out if that camera hole is a bit bigger than the current one. I&#8217;m hoping for 5mp in the new phone, although I would probably be happy with a 3.2mp with Auto-focus. Sony Ericsson have used them in their phones for years so I can&#8217;t see the lens costing that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisdejabet</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalintrovert.com/2009/02/13/leaked-photos-of-next-iphone-case/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisdejabet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomacintosh.com/?p=575#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Judging from the picture that shows the inside of the shell, that really looks like plastic to me, not metal. My guess is it is black plastic that has been rubberized on the external side. The shiny Logo and Lettering is probably done in a similar process as &quot;Gold Leaf&quot; which you see on many leatherbound books (think of the gold or silver lettering on a leather Bible, for example).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging from the picture that shows the inside of the shell, that really looks like plastic to me, not metal. My guess is it is black plastic that has been rubberized on the external side. The shiny Logo and Lettering is probably done in a similar process as &#8220;Gold Leaf&#8221; which you see on many leatherbound books (think of the gold or silver lettering on a leather Bible, for example).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

